ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2026
An improved method for Gill's hematoxylin and eosin staining based on the optimal acetic acid ratio.
Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The staining performance of hemalum solutions is critically dependent on pH, yet the acetic acid content varies among different hemalum formulations. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the acetic acid ratio (pH) of Gill's hemalum and optimal nuclear staining, and to improve the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining method. Gill's hemalum with varying acetic acid concentrations was used for H&E staining of surgical and biopsy specimens. Optimal nuclear staining was achieved at 3.48% acetic acid (pH 2.47), with pH deviations compromising staining quality. Tissue-specific differences in nuclear staining were observed: liver, prostate, and lung stained better than stomach, thyroid, and breast, and surgical specimens outperformed biopsies. Notably, the staining effect of overacidified Gill's hemalum could not be restored by adding sodium hydroxide (NaOH). At the optimal pH, Gill's hemalum surpassed Harris' hemalum in nuclear staining quality. Furthermore, the addition of a pH buffer not only improved staining consistency but also significantly extended the usable lifespan of Gill's hemalum. These findings indicate that the acetic acid concentration (pH) of Gill's hemalum is a key quality control parameter for H&E staining. Gill's hemalum prepared with 3.48% acetic acid and used with a pH buffer, offers significant practical value and is recommended for routine use in a pathology laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42541617What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.