ArticleAngiogenesis2026
Semi-automated quantification of total and avascular retinal area in the rat model of oxygen-induced retinopathy.
Article in Angiogenesis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantification of retinal and avascular areas in the rat oxygen induced retinopathy (OIR) model is traditionally performed using time-intensive manual methods that may be subject to inter-rater variability. We developed and validated two open-source, semi-automated Fiji (Fiji is Just ImageJ) macros to measure total retinal area (RA) and avascular area (AA) in rat 50/10 OIR retinal flat mounts. Concordance correlation coefficients demonstrated high agreement between macro-derived and manual measurements for RA (0.988), AA (0.985), and AA/RA (0.983), with minimal bias observed. While inter-user variability was higher for macro-based AA measurements compared to manual methods, averaging results from two users improved precision. These semi-automated tools reduce analysis time and training burden while maintaining strong agreement with gold standard measurements. Although limited by user input requirements and single-laboratory validation, these macros provide accessible, standardized methods for retinal quantification and have the potential to improve reproducibility and efficiency in OIR research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42541595What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.