ArticlePlanta2026
Dormancy dynamics in Japanese plum: transcriptomic responses to variable climatic conditions and chilling requirements.
Article in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionClimate exerted a stronger influence than dormancy stage on gene expression in Japanese plum, revealing climate- and genotype-specific regulatory patterns underlying dormancy control and climate adaptation. Dormancy progression in temperate fruit trees is highly sensitive to environmental conditions and chilling accumulation. To investigate the regulation of dormancy in Japanese plum (Prunus salicina hybrids), we performed a comparative transcriptomic analysis of flower buds from two Japanese plum cultivars with different chilling requirements, "Hiromi Red" (high chill) and "Crimson Glo" (low chill), grown under contrasting climates (semi-arid and Mediterranean subtropical). This study combined phenological observations, quantification of chill and heat requirements, as well as transcriptomic analyses across three key developmental stages: full dormancy (T0), dormancy release (T1), and full recovery (T2). Climate exerted a stronger influence than dormancy stage on gene expression profiles, leading to cultivar- and climate-specific transcriptional responses. Key dormancy-related genes-such as DAM, FT, and SAP1- exhibited differential expression patterns across climates, suggesting potential roles in climatic adaptation. Notably, dormancy phases occurred approximately one month later under Mediterranean subtropical conditions, and were accompanied by a marked reduction in chilling requirements. Expression and phylogenetic analyses revealed that environmental conditions had a stronger effect on the transcriptomic profiles than the progression of dormancy itself, potentially due to epigenetic modulation. These findings provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying dormancy in woody perennial species and offer perspectives for developing cultivars better adapted to changing climatic scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.