ArticleEnvironmental management2026
Rural Outmigration and its Double-edged Effects on Community Forestry Ecology and Governance.
Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community forestry (CF) is widely regMarquardt K,arded as an effective decentralized governance model that delivers both social and ecological benefits. Yet, accelerating rural outmigration, driven by economic pressures and shifting generational priorities, is reshaping community demographics and challenging CF governance, a dynamic that remains empirically underexplored. Addressing this gap, this study investigates how outmigration affects forest cover, community reliance on forest resources, and the level of community participation in forestry, using both primary and secondary data from Sindhupalchowk, Nepal. Community participation in forestry is assessed across multiple dimensions, including operational activities, decision-making, and meeting attendance. The findings indicate that population decline, primarily driven by limited local livelihood opportunities, is associated with forest regeneration, suggesting that outmigration may contribute to ecological recovery. Concurrently, increasing depopulation corresponds with reduced reliance on forest resources, reflecting a broader transformation in local livelihood practices. However, this depopulation also weakens community engagement in forest management. Higher migration rates reduce participation in operational activities, decision-making, and meetings, with unemployment-driven migration having the strongest negative impact on decision-making. Overall, while reduced population pressure may support forest recovery, it simultaneously undermines local community participation, particularly in critical decision-making processes influenced by unemployment-related migration. These findings reveal a double-edged dynamic: declining populations reduce resource pressures and enable forest recovery yet concurrently weaken participatory governance and undermine the long-term socio-ecological functioning of CF systems. These findings highlight the need for adaptive strategies that align forest recovery with institutional renewal to sustain inclusive and effective CF in the context of continued demographic change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.