ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Haptic signals enhance vestibular self-motion perception and reduces vestibular misperception.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated whether haptic contact modulates vestibular-induced self-motion perception and reduces perceptual errors caused by asymmetric vestibular stimulation. Fifteen healthy right-handed participants underwent asymmetric sinusoidal whole-body rotations about the vertical axis in darkness, consisting of half-cycles with equal amplitudes but different velocities, a paradigm known to induce errors in the localization of a previously memorized visual target. This error, quantified as the final position error (FPE), mainly results from reduced self-motion perception during the slower half-cycle. Under vestibular-only conditions, a large FPE was observed after four cycles. To investigate the influence of haptic input, participants touched a spatially fixed object with either the right or the left hand during asymmetric rotation The object was placed either at the body midline or in the right or left hemispace. Haptic contact significantly reduced the vestibular induced FPE, by enhancing perception of the slow self-motion, likely through proprioceptive input from the upper limb. The strongest improvement was observed when participants used the right hand to contact an object in the right hemispace, with smaller reductions occurring with right-hand contact at the midline or in the left hemispace. The effect was less pronounced with left-hand contact. Importantly, although haptic contact markedly reduced vestibular-induced perceptual errors, it did not abolish the underlying vestibular adaptive process responsible for the FPE. In conclusion, haptic contact significantly mitigates vestibular-induced self-motion misperception, with effects depending on both hand laterality and contact location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42541566What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.