Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42541562›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Guttae modifying effect following intracameral injection of magnetically delivered human corneal endothelial cells in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Ellen H Koo, Sarah Pajek, Andrea Santiago-Leon, Allen O Eghrari, Ryan Stanfield, Li Fan, Noelia J Kunzevitzky, Christina J Fleming, Heather S Elliott, Roger A Goldberg and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ellen H KooBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 900 NW 17th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. exk126@med.miami.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5016-2775
Sarah PajekBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 900 NW 17th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Andrea Santiago-LeonBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 900 NW 17th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Allen O EghrariWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ryan StanfieldBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 900 NW 17th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Li FanBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 900 NW 17th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Noelia J KunzevitzkyEmmecell, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Christina J FlemingEmmecell, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Heather S ElliottEmmecell, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Roger A GoldbergEmmecell, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Jeffrey L GoldbergEmmecell, Menlo Park, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the quantitative changes in the number and spatial distribution of corneal guttae in subjects with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) following a single intracameral injection of allogeneic magnetic human corneal endothelial cells (EO2002).

methodsThis prospective analysis included participants from a Phase 1 U.S. multicenter study who received an intracameral injection of EO2002 without concurrent endothelial polishing (endobrushing) or Descemet membrane stripping. High-resolution retroillumination images of the central cornea were captured at pre-injection (baseline), 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment. Corneal guttae were meticulously quantified by two independent, masked graders using a standardized protocol involving a 7-zone concentric circular grid overlaid on the images. Inter-grader reliability was assessed.

resultsFour participants who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. A significant reduction in central corneal guttae was observed. The mean percentage decrease in guttae count compared to pre-injection in the central analytical zones was 53% ± 28% (standard deviation) at 3 months, progressing to 70% ± 16% at 6 months. The reduction was most pronounced in the central and paracentral zones, corresponding to the primary targeted delivery area of the magnetically guided cells, with a diminishing effect towards the periphery.

conclusionsThis study provides the first quantitative evidence of visible guttae reduction per retroillumination photography in FECD following endothelial cell therapy, without endo-polishing, Descemet membrane stripping or surgical manipulation. Our findings suggest that magnetically guided allogeneic CEC therapy may alter the Descemet membrane-endothelial complex in FECD.

Indexed as

CECCell therapyCorneal edemaEndothelial cellsFuchs corneal dystrophyFuchs dystrophyFuchs endothelial corneal dystrophyGuttaeHCEC

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.