Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42541554›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Standardizing serial prostate MRI in active surveillance: a practical review of PRECISE scoring.

Negar Firoozeh, Hyungwoo Ahn, Ronaldo Baroni, Valdair F Muglia, Andrei Purysko, Nicola Schieda, Antonio C Westphalen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Negar FiroozehDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Hyungwoo AhnDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. hyungwoo@uw.edu.
Ronaldo BaroniDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Valdair F MugliaDepartment of Medical Images, Oncology and Hematology, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Prêto, Brazil.
Andrei PuryskoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
Nicola SchiedaDepartment of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Antonio C WestphalenDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. acwestph@uw.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5323-7632

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS) is an established management strategy for men with low-risk and some favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Multiparametric MRI (MRI) plays an increasingly important role in AS, contributing to initial risk stratification, confirmatory evaluation, and longitudinal monitoring. However, comparing baseline and follow-up MR images is challenging because acquisition varies, readers differ, and imaging alone has limited ability to define clinically meaningful progression. The Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scoring system was developed to standardize the assessment of interval change on serial prostate MRI. PRECISE provides a structured framework for categorizing radiologic regression, stability, and progression, thereby addressing a key limitation of Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), which was designed for lesion detection rather than longitudinal assessment. PRECISE version 2 further refines definitions and introduces clearer categories, including separation of stable visible and stable non-visible disease and recognition of non-diagnostic examinations. Available evidence suggests that PRECISE performs best as a rule-out tool, with consistently high negative predictive value for clinically significant progression, while radiologic progression demonstrates more limited positive predictive value for histopathologic upgrading. Although PRECISE reduces subjective interpretation through structured scoring, its application remains affected by variability in MRI quality and heterogeneity in AS protocols. To mitigate these limitations, radiologists should incorporate prostate-specific antigen kinetics, biopsy results, and clinical context into their interpretation of serial MRI. In this review, we provide a practical, radiologist-focused overview of PRECISE, summarize its evolution and evidence base, and illustrate its application in clinical practice. We also discuss key limitations, common pitfalls, and the importance of MRI quality and standardization in improving reproducibility. PRECISE represents an important step toward standardized longitudinal assessment in prostate cancer AS and supports more consistent, evidence-based multidisciplinary decision-making.

Indexed as

Active surveillanceImagingManagementMRIProstate cancerRadiology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.