ArticlePhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2026
Development and Validation of the WAI-Tele-Reha-G: A Measure of Therapeutic Alliance in Telerehabilitation.
Article in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of the WAI-Tele-Reha-G: A Measure of Therapeutic Alliance in Telerehabilitation.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeTherapeutic alliance (TA)-the collaborative therapist-client partnership-is pivotal to outcomes, yet TA tools tailored to telerehabilitation are limited. We developed and preliminarily validated a therapist-reported measure for physiotherapists (PTs), occupational therapists (OTs), and speech and language therapists (SLTs): the Working Alliance Inventory-Telerehabilitation (WAI-Tele-Reha-G).
methodsItems drew on expert interviews, adaptation guidelines, and the German WAI-Short Revised (therapist version) and were refined via cognitive interviews (n = 9) and pilot testing (n = 34). Validation involved German-speaking PTs, OTs, and SLTs (test: n = 128; retest: n = 84). Rasch partial credit modelling assessed model fit, unidimensionality, local independence, threshold ordering, and differential item functioning (DIF). Reliability (Cronbach's alpha, Person Separation Index [PSI]), test-retest reliability (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient [CCC]), convergent validity (with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology-2 Questionnaire [UTAUT-2], Technology Commitment-Short Scale, 5-item Revised Vocational Self-Efficacy Scale), known-groups validity, and targeting were evaluated.
resultsGoal, task and bond scales generally fit the Rasch model and were unidimensional with ordered thresholds; no DIF was detected in this sample. Minor local dependence in the task scale was handled via a superitem during Rasch estimation; scoring remained at the item level. Internal consistency was good (alpha = 0.80-0.81) and PSI modest (0.72-0.74). Test-retest reliability was excellent (CCC = 0.81-0.93). Correlations among goal, task, and bond were moderate-to-strong; correlations with technology acceptance/commitment and vocational self-efficacy were low-to-moderate, as hypothesised. Ceiling effects were < 15%, with targeting skewed towards higher TA levels. DISCUSSION: The WAI-Tele-Reha-G shows preliminary evidence of satisfactory psychometric properties for a therapist-reported assessment of TA in telerehabilitation. Interpretation should consider the modest sample, therapist-only perspective, targeting skew, and Rasch adjustments. Future work should add more challenging items to improve discrimination at high TA levels and develop a patient-reported version to capture the dyadic nature of TA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.