ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026
Effect of clinical pharmacist consultation on postoperative pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction after pacemaker implantation: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective management of postoperative pain is vital for recovery following pacemaker (PM) implantation. This study evaluated a pain management protocol incorporating clinical pharmacist consultation to improve patient outcomes and healthcare utilization. Methods: In this randomized, unblinded controlled trial, 60 adults undergoing PM implantation were assigned to either standard care (control) or standard care plus a structured clinical pharmacist consultation (intervention). Pain intensity was measured daily (Days 0-10) using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Quality of Life (QoL) was assessed on Days 0, 1, 7, and 10 via European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) version and European Quality of Life visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) instruments. Patient satisfaction was measured on Day 10 using the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS). Results: Pain intensity and QoL scores improved significantly over time in both groups, with no statistically significant differences between groups. Medication adherence, physician contacts, and unresolved adverse effects were comparable between groups. In contrast, patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the intervention group, particularly regarding care, communication, and perceived respect. Conclusion: Clinical pharmacist consultation did not significantly alter postoperative pain intensity or QoL outcomes following PM implantation. However, it was associated with higher patient satisfaction, suggesting a meaningful contribution to the patient experience. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are warranted to clarify the impact of pharmacist involvement on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.