ReviewGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology
Portuguese Pancreatic Club Perspective on Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Diagnosis, Characterization and Indications for Fine-Needle Aspiration/Biopsy, Advanced Endoscopic Ultrasound Imaging Techniques and Role of Pancreatoscopy.
Review in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The majority of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are asymptomatic and diagnosis is incidental when imaging studies are requested due to unrelated indications. Summary: Although they are usually harmless findings, they have potential for malignant transformation. In this review, Portuguese Pancreatic Club summarizes the most recent recommendations regarding diagnosis, characterization, use of advanced endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) modalities, general management of IPMNs and role of pancreatoscopy. Key Messages: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging/cholangiopancreatography (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality for the characterization of IPMNs. EUS should be considered in the evaluation of cysts of uncertain significance, in assessing the malignant risk of mucinous lesions, and when MRI is insufficient to define the clinical approach. Fine-needle aspiration with cytological analysis, measurement of biomarkers, and molecular studies in the cyst fluid should only be performed when its results might modify further management. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography, needle-based confocal endomicroscopy and EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy are promising complementary techniques that may increase diagnostic accuracy. Peroral pancreatoscopy is being increasingly used for main-duct evaluation in patients with suspected or confirmed IPMNs. Many of these techniques are still confined to tertiary referral centers, and associated with steep learning curves and interobserver discrepancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.