ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness for Hysteroscopically Assisted Falloposcopic Tuboplasty in Women with Proximal Tubal Infertility.
Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Tubal infertility accounts for approximately 30% of infertility cases in women. Falloposcopic tuboplasty (FT) is used in women with proximal tubal obstruction. However, it is technically challenging because of difficulties in locating the tubal ostium and confirming success. To address these challenges, we developed a hysteroscopically assisted FT (HA-FT). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HA-FT in women with tubal infertility. Materials and Methods: This prospective unblinded study included infertile women with proximal tubal obstruction who desired a natural conception. HA-FT was performed under either intravenous or general anesthesia. Postoperative hysterosalpingography was performed in an operating room to confirm success. Success and pregnancy rates of HA-FT were compared with those of regular FT (Reg-FT). Results: Regular FT ( Conclusion: HA-FT is a safe, effective, and reliable method for the treatment of proximal tubal obstruction. Its natural pregnancy rates are acceptable, making it a promising option for women with tubal infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.