ArticleIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
Iodized Salt Consumption Practices and Iodine Status in the Rural Adult Population Near Chennai, India.
Article in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite initiatives, the lack of understanding and improper usage habits for iodized salt are still prevalent. This cross-sectional study was conducted in rural Thiruvallur district of Tamil Nadu to assess the amount of iodine in the salt consumed, determine dietary iodine consumption, urinary iodine concentration, and understand the knowledge and practices related to iodized salt usage. Methods: A questionnaire was designed and validated to assess knowledge and practices of procuring, storing salt, and cooking practices. A standard field-testing kit was used to estimate the salt's iodine level, and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines values were taken for adequacy of iodization. Per capita consumption of salt was calculated by dividing the monthly purchase by family members partaking and iodine intake was calculated from a three-day dietary recall using the US FDA database. Spot urinary samples were collected to estimate the Median Urinary Iodine Concentration (MUIC). Results: Out of 650 households, 79% procured packaged salt; 40% were not aware of iodized salt; and 50.4% felt that consuming iodized salt is not important. The majority (91%) of the subjects added iodized salt at the beginning of cooking, 95% covered the storage container, and 32% exposed the salt to heat. Around 31% used uniodized or inadequately iodized salt. More than a quarter (27%) of them had the MUIC in the deficient range. Conclusion: A third of the population continues to use inadequately iodized salt, and the awareness of IDD and the importance of iodized salt is low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.