ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2026
Data-driven subphenotyping uncovers ulcerative colitis subtype with high risk for relapse in Japan: a prospective multicenter cohort study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical symptoms do not necessarily align with disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). It remains unclear whether patient-reported outcomes (PROs), particularly quality of life (QOL) measures, can help characterize clinically meaningful subphenotypes among Japanese patients with UC in remission. This study aimed to identify and characterize UC subphenotypes using clustering analysis. Methods: We used data from a multicenter, prospective UC patient registry in Japan, called "YOu and Ulcerative colitis: Registry and Social network (YOURS)" (December 2018-June 2022). We assessed laboratory values and PRO data, including clinical symptoms and QOL data (e.g., fatigue, anxiety, disease-specific QOL), of patients with UC in remission. Discovery (N = 365) and replication (N = 982) datasets were independently created and subjected to clustering analysis. Data were standardized for sex (a potential confounder for various measures). Findings: PRO data correlated poorly with traditional clinical laboratory parameters. Three reproducible clusters were detected in both datasets: one cluster was characterized by lower QOL and average laboratory profiles, while the other two clusters showed preserved QOL scores either with or without distinct laboratory profiles. The cluster with lower QOL and average laboratory profiles demonstrated increased relapse rates during a 3-year follow-up in each dataset compared with the respective other two clusters. Interpretation: PRO assessments offer unique, clinically relevant data, distinct from routine biomarkers and clinical scores. Stratifying patients with UC using combined QOL and clinical laboratory parameters may help identify patients at higher risk of relapse and warrants further evaluation for its potential role in clinical decision-making. Funding: This study was funded by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.