Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42541133›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Analysis of the effectiveness of arthroscopic cannulated screw fixation for coracoid process fractures.

Yang Yang, Fang Chen, Chao Feng, Qiyuan Pan, ZhiJun Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yang Yang *Department of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Yubei District, Chongqing, China.
Fang Chen *Department of Infectious Disease, People's Hospital of Yubei District, Chongqing, China.
Chao FengDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Yubei District, Chongqing, China.
Qiyuan PanDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Yubei District, Chongqing, China.
ZhiJun ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Yubei District, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of minimally invasive arthroscopic treatment for coracoid process fractures. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 17 patients with coracoid process fractures treated between January 2020 and October 2025, comprising 8 patients managed with shoulder arthroscopy (Arthroscopy group) and 9 patients treated via open surgery (Open group). Preoperative baseline characteristics, including gender, age, body mass index(BMI),injury mechanism, injury type, Eyres classification, and concomitant rotator cuff injuries, showed no significant differences between groups ( Results: The arthroscopy group demonstrated significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter postoperative hospitalization compared to the open group ( Conclusion: Compared to traditional open surgery, arthroscopic minimally invasive treatment of coracoid process fractures achieves comparable accuracy in screw placement, operative duration, and fracture healing time. The arthroscopic approach, however, results in less intraoperative bleeding and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. It also leads to more pronounced improvements in postoperative pain and shoulder function. Furthermore, it enables the concurrent treatment of associated shoulder pathologies, such as rotator cuff injury, acromial impingement, or glenohumeral joint lesions.

Indexed as

acromioclavicular jointcoracoid process fracturehollow screwminimally invasive surgeryshoulder arthroscopy

Identifiers

PMID42541133
PMCPMC13427042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.