ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Exposure keratopathy and conjunctival microbial flora in mechanically ventilated patients - A hospital-based prospective study.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation are at risk of exposure keratopathy and conjunctival microbial colonization. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of exposure keratopathy and the pattern of conjunctival microbial flora in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Material and Methods: Ocular evaluation for the presence of EK using fluorescein dye and grading was done in patients on mechanical ventilation in ICUs. Conjunctival swabs from these patients were analyzed for culture and sensitivity on day 3 and day 7. Regular follow-up was done. Results: A total of 52 patients were included with a mean age of 51.57 ± 16.65 years, with sepsis (28%) as the most common cause for admission. 32% of patients had EK, and the most common organisms found in different grades of EK were Conclusions: Eye care in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation is often ignored, and it can lead to rare but potentially devastating complications such as corneal perforation and endophthalmitis, which have long-term consequences on a patient's quality of life. Hence, it is essential to monitor eye care, assess EK, and manage at the earliest with a standard eye care protocol for mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.