ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Comparative effects of ciprofol and propofol on perioperative hemodynamics during hip arthroplasty in older adults with frailty: A prospective randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The proportion of older adults with frailty undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased significantly against the backdrop of the rapidly aging population. However, the benefits of ciprofol in this population have not been widely investigated. Material and Methods: We conducted a single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. From October 2024 to July 2025, this study was conducted at a large, university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. After obtaining ethical approval, 78 older adults with frailty undergoing hip arthroplasty scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery were enrolled. Using a randomized numerical table method, they were classified into either the ciprofol group (Group A) or the propofol group (Group B), with 39 patients in each group. Cardiac output (CO) and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at eight intraoperative time points from T0 to T7, in addition to the use of intraoperative vasoactive drugs, postoperative awakening time, extubation time, postoperative complications, and length of hospitalization. Results: At T2 (preintubation) and T3 (immediately postintubation), MAP and CO in the ciprofol group were significantly higher than those in the propofol group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the use of intraoperative vasoactive drugs was significantly lower in Group A. No significant differences were observed between these groups in postoperative awakening time, extubation time, the length of hospitalization, and complications. Conclusions: Ciprofol shows comparable efficacy as propofol for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia during THA in older adults with frailty. Furthermore, ciprofol yields a better perioperative hemodynamic profile and causes fewer adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.