Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540838›Full record

ArticleCannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)2026

Provider Perspectives of Conversations and Practices Surrounding Perinatal Cannabis Use.

Marie A Hayes, Sara M Witcraft, Emily Johnson, Kathleen Brady, Constance Guille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie A HayesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
Sara M WitcraftDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
Emily JohnsonCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina.
Kathleen BradyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
Constance GuilleDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore practices and perspectives of perinatal providers related to cannabis use during pregnancy and postpartum. Method: A mixed methods approach was employed using data collected from 18 perinatal providers practicing in the United States. Results: Most (72%) providers surveyed conduct universal evidence-based screening for perinatal cannabis use. Providers report these conversations are important and relevant, but only 55% report comfort with the topic. Four higher-order themes and five sub-themes emerged to further describe providers experiences of these conversations, including barriers and beliefs. Conclusions: Providers believe conversations about peripartum cannabis use are important, but describe needing additional support navigating up-to-date information, legal statues, and patient perceptions.

Indexed as

cannabishealthcare conversationobstetricsperinatalpostpartumpregnant

Identifiers

PMID42540838
PMCPMC13426739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.