ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2026
A Visual Fatigue Scale to Measure Cancer-Related Fatigue: The Process of Development.
Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and often underreported issue in the outpatient setting. Advanced practitioners are crucial in assessing and managing CRF, as they are frequently in contact with patients and can observe changes in their condition. Implementing a multidimensional fatigue scale that incorporates images could enhance and expedite the screening process for CRF in cancer outpatient care. Objective: The purpose of this study was to create a practical tool for clinical use, specifically a brief, self-rating pictorial scale designed to assess CRF. Methods: Nine focus groups comprised of oncology clinical experts and volunteer patients/survivors were conducted at a large National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center. Clinical expert focus groups convened online for 1-hour meetings every 2 weeks, spanning four sessions. During these sessions, the focus groups examined existing cancer fatigue scales and reviewed relevant literature. One of the advanced practice providers created an initial version of a pictorial fatigue scale. Patients then contributed their insights via multiple focus groups based on their personal experiences with CRF. Subsequently, a professional graphic artist refined the images, incorporating the patients' feedback to enhance the scale's accuracy and effectiveness. Data evaluation and synthesis: Content validity was established for a Visual Fatigue Scale measuring CRF using an iterative process with nine focus groups made up of oncology clinical experts and patients. The final scale included two image sets and a 10-point numeric scale to correspond with four levels of fatigue (none, mild, moderate, severe). Implications: The Visual Fatigue Scale can help identify patients who need more comprehensive evaluation and management, ensuring timely and effective interventions. By utilizing such a scale, health-care providers can better address the multifaceted nature of CRF, improving patient outcomes and quality of life.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.