ArticleActa medica Philippina2026
Predicting Blood Donor Retention Using the Random Forest Classification Algorithm: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Critical Adoption of Disruptive Health Technology.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Maintaining a stable and safe blood supply remains a persistent challenge for blood collection agencies, particularly in settings where donor participation is influenced by behavioral and psychological factors. Identifying reliable predictors of blood donor retention is essential for improving donor management and sustaining blood services. Objective: To develop and evaluate a Random Forest-based machine learning model for predicting blood donor retention using demographic, behavioral, and psychological data. Methods: A retrospective cohort with a cross-sectional exploratory component was conducted among blood donors from the Department of Health-Regional Blood Center of Cagayan Valley. Data were obtained from two sources: retrospective records of 612 donors (2023-2025), which included demographic characteristics, blood type, and donation history, and a survey administered to 100 prospective donors to assess psychological factors such as motivation, attitudes, satisfaction, and perceived barriers. Behavioral features-donation frequency, recency, tenure, and total donation count-were derived from donation records. Psychological variables were analyzed using Principal Component Analysis and K-means clustering. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). Results: Demographic and biological characteristics, including age, sex, and blood type, described the donor population but were not key predictors of donor retention. Behavioral indicators-particularly donation frequency, recency, tenure, and cumulative donation count-were the strongest predictors of continued donation. Psychological analysis identified distinct donor profiles, with most respondents exhibiting high motivation and satisfaction, and smaller clusters reporting lower satisfaction or greater perceived barriers. The Random Forest model demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an accuracy of 0.989, F1 score of 0.994, and ROC-AUC of 0.994. Conclusion: Blood donor retention is driven primarily by behavioral engagement and psychological factors rather than demographic or biological characteristics. The Random Forest model effectively identifies donors likely to return, supporting targeted donor engagement strategies and improved resource allocation in blood service facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.