Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540713›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Robotic Repair of Right-Sided Direct Inguinal, Indirect Inguinal, Femoral, and Obturator Hernias (Quadruple Groin Hernias).

John J Kessler, Stephen Kavic, Hugo J Bonatti

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John J KesslerSurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Stephen KavicSurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Hugo J BonattiSurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inguinal, femoral, and obturator hernias are a bulge or protrusion of abdominal contents into the inguinal canal, femoral ring, and obturator ring, respectively. Only a few cases of combined inguinal and femoral or obturator hernias have been reported. Laparoscopic and robotic repair seems safe and feasible in these cases. A 74-year-old male presented with significant pain and a bulge protruding in the right groin reaching into the scrotum. He consented to robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair.  Eight mm trocars were placed into the umbilicus and to the left and right of it. On exploration, a right pantaloon hernia was visualized. The peritoneal flap was developed from a transverse incision above the hernia. On preperitoneal dissection, in addition, a femoral hernia was found. The contents of all three hernias were reduced, and the sack of the indirect hernia was degloved after the chord was dissected off. The lateral channel was developed in the usual fashion. Whilst developing the medial channel to below the pubic bone, an obturator hernia was found; the contents were reduced. The large medial inguinal hernia defect was closed with a running 3-0 barbed suture. The landing zone was fully developed. A large self-fixating mesh was placed covering all four hernia defects with appropriate overlap in all directions. The patient was discharged within three hours after surgery and had an uneventful recovery.  To the best of our knowledge, this is the first "quadruple" groin hernia repair using the robotic approach. During dissection in laparoscopic/robotic inguinal hernia repair, surgeons should actively look for additional defects.

Indexed as

inguinal hernia repairinguinal hernia surgerymesh inguinal hernioplastyrare inguinal herniarobotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair

Identifiers

PMID42540713
PMCPMC13426292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.