Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540675›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Historical and contemporary butterfly genomes reveal genetic erosion in response to land-use intensification.

Nathalie Matthey-de-l'Endroit, Daniel Berner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nathalie Matthey-de-l'EndroitDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology & Evolution, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel BernerDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology & Evolution, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity loss is typically assessed at the level of species extinctions, yet many populations are declining without the species going extinct. A major global driver of such declines is the intensification of agriculture beginning in the mid-20th century. To assess the genomic consequences of this shift, we compare genome-wide sequence data from historical (1875-1955) and contemporary individuals of a once-ubiquitous European grassland butterfly. Demographic inference reveals population growth over millennia, likely associated with grassland expansion under low-intensity agriculture, followed by a population decline exceeding 99% that peaks during mid-20th century land-use intensification. This rapid population decline is accompanied by the loss of genetic diversity, increased population differentiation, and inbreeding. Overall, our results demonstrate the dual role of agricultural land use in shaping biodiversity: while low-intensity practices historically facilitated population expansion, modern agricultural intensification has driven dramatic population decline and genetic erosion, a trajectory likely shared by many grassland species worldwide.

Indexed as

agriculturebiodiversityconservation geneticsgenetic variationinbreedinginsect declinelepidopteraMelanargia galatheapopulation genomicspopulation size

Identifiers

PMID42540675
PMCPMC13426219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.