Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540672›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Prevalence of Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD) Antibody Positivity in Young-Onset Diabetes: A Retrospective Study From Northeast India.

Pranjal K Dutta, Anupam Dutta, Sanjeeb Kakati, Karuna K Barman, Dinesh Agarwal, Bikash Bhattacharjee, Neelakshi Bhattacharyya, Rahul Neog, Reema Nath, Chittaranjan S Yajnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pranjal K DuttaDepartment of Medicine, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, IND.
Anupam DuttaDepartment of Medicine, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, IND.
Sanjeeb KakatiDepartment of Medicine, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, IND.
Karuna K BarmanDiabetes and Endocrinology, Barman Diabetes Specialities, Guwahati, IND.
Dinesh AgarwalDepartment of Medicine, Marwari Hospitals, Guwahati, IND.
Bikash BhattacharjeeDiabetes and Endocrinology, Sun Valley Hospital, Guwahati, IND.
Neelakshi BhattacharyyaMultidisciplinary Research Unit, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, IND.
Rahul NeogMultidisciplinary Research Unit, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, IND.
Reema NathDepartment of Microbiology, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, IND.
Chittaranjan S YajnikDiabetes and Endocrinology, KEM Hospital, Pune, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is a distinct form of diabetes characterized by autoimmune β-cell destruction with a slower progression compared to classical type 1 diabetes. It is frequently misclassified as type 2 diabetes, particularly in younger individuals, leading to suboptimal management. The presence of anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies is a key diagnostic marker for LADA. However, data on the prevalence and distribution of GAD antibodies among young-onset diabetes patients in Northeast India are limited.

methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the Multidisciplinary Research Unit of a tertiary care center in Northeast India using archived serum samples from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-funded PHENOEINDY-2 (Phenotyping North East Indian Young Type 2 Diabetes) cohort study (2017-2021). A total of 149 individuals diagnosed with diabetes before 40 years of age were included based on the availability of adequate stored serum samples. Serum anti-GAD antibody levels were measured using a standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Participants were categorized as GAD-negative (<5 U/mL) or GAD-positive (≥5 U/mL), the latter considered suggestive of an autoimmune diabetes phenotype. Descriptive analyses were performed to determine the prevalence and distribution of GAD antibody levels.

resultsThe overall mean GAD antibody level was 3.17 U/mL, with a median of 1.07 U/mL and a wide range (0.26-109.15 U/mL), demonstrating a markedly right-skewed distribution (skewness 7.52; kurtosis 63.29). Fourteen patients (9.4%) were classified as GAD-positive, indicating a probable diagnosis of LADA. The GAD-negative group (n=135) showed a tightly clustered distribution with low variability (mean 0.95 U/mL; SD 0.54 U/mL), consistent with non-autoimmune diabetes. In contrast, the GAD-positive group exhibited substantial heterogeneity (mean 24.58 U/mL; SD 29.67 U/mL), with several individuals demonstrating markedly elevated antibody levels exceeding 70-100 U/mL. Visual analyses confirmed a clear separation between the two groups, with compact clustering in the GAD-negative cohort and a wide dispersion in the GAD-positive subgroup.

conclusionApproximately 1 in 10 young-onset diabetes patients in this cohort demonstrated GAD positivity, suggesting that autoimmune diabetes represents an important subset of young-onset diabetes in Northeast India. These findings provide preliminary epidemiological evidence on the prevalence of GAD positivity in this population and support the need for larger prospective studies incorporating detailed clinical phenotyping, metabolic follow-up, and evaluation of the clinical utility of GAD antibody testing to improve diagnostic classification and patient management.

Indexed as

autoimmune diabetesglutamic acid decarboxylase (gad) antibodieslatent autoimmune diabetes in adults (lada)northeast indiayoung-onset diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42540672
PMCPMC13426293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.