Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540660›Full record

ReviewChemical science2026

Data-driven interfacial regulations through molecular additive screening for batteries and electrocatalysis.

Guanyu Wang, Shun Zou, Siyuan Lai, Shujie Zhang, Yumo Zhang, Bowen Jiang, Yujie Shi, Guobin Wen, Hongshuai Hou, Bohua Ren and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Guanyu WangCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha 410083 China renbohua@csu.edu.cn.
Shun ZouCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha 410083 China renbohua@csu.edu.cn.
Siyuan LaiCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha 410083 China renbohua@csu.edu.cn.
Shujie ZhangCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha 410083 China renbohua@csu.edu.cn.
Yumo ZhangCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha 410083 China renbohua@csu.edu.cn.
Bowen JiangCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha 410083 China renbohua@csu.edu.cn.
Yujie ShiState Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University Changsha 410082 China.
Guobin WenState Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University Changsha 410082 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-6734
Hongshuai HouCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha 410083 China renbohua@csu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8201-4614
Bohua RenCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha 410083 China renbohua@csu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2131-2973
Xiaobo JiCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha 410083 China renbohua@csu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5405-7913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular additives are widely employed to regulate electrochemical interfaces, but their rational design remains constrained by fragmented mechanistic understanding and the limited transferability of design principles across batteries and electrocatalysis. This review argues that many additive effects in these systems can be interpreted through three shared interfacial mechanisms: coordination remodeling, interfacial adsorption, and competitive inhibition. In batteries, these mechanisms govern metal deposition, electron-transfer-induced interphase engineering, and the management of reactive intermediates. In electrocatalysis, they underlie activity tuning, pathway steering, and selectivity enhancement through interfacial microenvironment regulation, adsorbate and surface-state regulation, and competing-reaction suppression. Building on this framework, we summarize a data-driven route for additive discovery spanning data mining, predictive modeling, screening, closed-loop optimization, and reasoning-guided and data-enabled exploration. Unlike previous reviews that mainly focus on specific battery chemistries, electrocatalytic microenvironments, or ML-assisted molecular discovery, this review extracts common interfacial mechanisms shared by batteries and electrocatalysis. By organizing molecular additives around shared interfacial primitives, this review identifies descriptor transferability as a key opportunity for data-driven additive design and emphasizes the need for cross-system benchmarks to quantitatively assess generalizability beyond individual chemistries. This framework provides a practical basis for the predictive design of multifunctional additives across electrochemical systems.

Identifiers

PMID42540660
PMCPMC13426364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.