ReviewChemical science2026
Data-driven interfacial regulations through molecular additive screening for batteries and electrocatalysis.
Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular additives are widely employed to regulate electrochemical interfaces, but their rational design remains constrained by fragmented mechanistic understanding and the limited transferability of design principles across batteries and electrocatalysis. This review argues that many additive effects in these systems can be interpreted through three shared interfacial mechanisms: coordination remodeling, interfacial adsorption, and competitive inhibition. In batteries, these mechanisms govern metal deposition, electron-transfer-induced interphase engineering, and the management of reactive intermediates. In electrocatalysis, they underlie activity tuning, pathway steering, and selectivity enhancement through interfacial microenvironment regulation, adsorbate and surface-state regulation, and competing-reaction suppression. Building on this framework, we summarize a data-driven route for additive discovery spanning data mining, predictive modeling, screening, closed-loop optimization, and reasoning-guided and data-enabled exploration. Unlike previous reviews that mainly focus on specific battery chemistries, electrocatalytic microenvironments, or ML-assisted molecular discovery, this review extracts common interfacial mechanisms shared by batteries and electrocatalysis. By organizing molecular additives around shared interfacial primitives, this review identifies descriptor transferability as a key opportunity for data-driven additive design and emphasizes the need for cross-system benchmarks to quantitatively assess generalizability beyond individual chemistries. This framework provides a practical basis for the predictive design of multifunctional additives across electrochemical systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.