Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540621›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational radiation oncology2026

Reirradiation of locally recurrent prostate Cancer: a review of prospective evidence and delineation and planning strategies from the reirradiation Collaborative group (ReCOG).

Finbar Slevin, Brad Warkentin, Jeremy Hansen, Ann M Henry, Louise J Murray, Donna H Murrell, Wee Loon Ong, David Pasquier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Finbar SlevinLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, UK and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Brad WarkentinDepartment of Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, University of Alberta; Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Cancer Care Alberta; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jeremy HansenVarian Medical Systems, Housten, TX, USA.
Ann M HenryLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, UK and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Louise J MurrayLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, UK and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Donna H MurrellDepartment of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Wee Loon OngAlfred Radiation Oncology, Bayside Health, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
David PasquierAcademic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Lille University, CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is considerable uncertainty regarding the optimum approaches to target volume and organ at risk (OAR) delineation and tolerances to reirradiation for locally recurrent prostate cancer. To address these uncertainties, we undertook a literature review of treatment planning approaches of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or brachytherapy reirradiation in published and ongoing prospective studies. Twenty published and 11 ongoing studies were identified. No phase 3 clinical trials were identified. Both focal and whole gland with/without simultaneous integrated boost approaches to target volume delineation were used. SBRT dose-fractionation schedules ranged from 25 to 42.5Gy in 5 fractions and 36-38Gy in 6 fractions with varying approaches to target objectives. Brachytherapy studies utilised both low dose rate and high dose rate approaches and employed a range of dose-fractionation schedules. Approaches to OAR delineation and constraints were heterogenous. No published and only 1 ongoing study utilises cumulative OAR constraints. Acceptable rates of genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in the majority of studies although some studies reported relatively high rates of severe toxicity events. The relatively short follow-up of some published series may underestimate the incidence of late toxicities. There remains uncertainty regarding optimum dose-fractionation schedules, target volumes and OAR constraints and how these influence toxicity. Prostate reirradiation using SBRT or brachytherapy can be used for treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer. Treatment is recommended within prospective studies or registries with robust target definition, treatment delivery and comprehensive assessment of toxicity so that evidence to optimise treatment can be generated.

Indexed as

brachytherapylocal recurrenceProstate cancerradiorecurrentre-irradiationreirradiationstereotactic ablative radiotherapystereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42540621
PMCPMC13426207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.