ArticleSexual medicine2026
Is extracorporeal shock wave therapy more effective in younger patients in the treatment of mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction? A prospective controlled study.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The influence of patient age on treatment outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy according to the patient's age. Methods: Patients with mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction (ED, International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] score 11-25) who were not receiving any medical or intracavernosal therapy were prospectively included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 age groups: <50 years and ≥ 50 years. All patients underwent the same ESWT protocol. No additional treatments were given to patients during the ESWT period or during follow-up. International Index of Erectile Function and erection hardness score (EHS) were recorded at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months. The effectiveness of ESWT was compared between the groups. Results: A total of 52 individuals were included in the study, with a mean age of 49.6 ± 13.6 years. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline IIEF scores and EHSs between the 2 groups ( Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that ESWT demonstrates higher clinical success rates in the younger patient group with mild-to-moderate ED compared with the older patient group. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy may be considered an effective and sufficient standalone treatment option in young patients with ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.