Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540505›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in nutrition2026

Fan Zheng, Yong Yang, Yu Zhan, Zhe Wen Zhang, Guanting Lu, Daoyuan Xie, Si-Ming Zhang, Uma Mageswary, Yeong-Yeh Lee, Min-Tze Liong

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fan Zheng *Deyang People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Deyang, China.
Yong Yang *Deyang People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Deyang, China.
Yu ZhanChengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zhe Wen ZhangKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular Imaging, Center for Artificial Intelligence Biology, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Guanting LuDeyang People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Deyang, China.
Daoyuan XieDeyang People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Deyang, China.
Si-Ming ZhangDeyang People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Deyang, China.
Uma MageswarySchool of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Yeong-Yeh LeeSchool of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.
Min-Tze LiongSchool of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Functional constipation is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction that substantially affects bowel function, psychological well-being, and quality of life. Probiotic supplementation represents a microbiota-targeted nutritional strategy for functional constipation, but associated host-response signals remain incompletely understood. Methods: This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 104 adults who met the Rome IV criteria for functional constipation. Participants received either Results: Probio87 supplementation significantly increased weekly complete spontaneous bowel movements compared with placebo at Week 8 and Week 12. Improvements were also observed in Rome IV symptom scores, constipation-related quality of life, and HAMD-24 domains related to anxiety, sleep, and retardation. Exploratory whole-blood gene-expression analysis showed differential host-response signals after intervention, characterized by increased BDNF expression and reduced expression of IL-1β, CD117, CXCR5, IDO1, DBH, and MLNR in the probiotic group relative to placebo. No intervention-related adverse events or clinically relevant abnormalities in hematological, hepatic, or renal safety parameters were observed. Conclusion: Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=205514, identifier (ChiCTR2300075360).

Indexed as

functional constipationgut–brain axisLactiplantibacillus plantarum Probio87probioticrandomized controlled trialwhole-blood gene expression

Identifiers

PMID42540505
PMCPMC13426275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.