Trial reportFrontiers in nutrition2026
Trial report in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional constipation is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction that substantially affects bowel function, psychological well-being, and quality of life. Probiotic supplementation represents a microbiota-targeted nutritional strategy for functional constipation, but associated host-response signals remain incompletely understood. Methods: This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 104 adults who met the Rome IV criteria for functional constipation. Participants received either Results: Probio87 supplementation significantly increased weekly complete spontaneous bowel movements compared with placebo at Week 8 and Week 12. Improvements were also observed in Rome IV symptom scores, constipation-related quality of life, and HAMD-24 domains related to anxiety, sleep, and retardation. Exploratory whole-blood gene-expression analysis showed differential host-response signals after intervention, characterized by increased BDNF expression and reduced expression of IL-1β, CD117, CXCR5, IDO1, DBH, and MLNR in the probiotic group relative to placebo. No intervention-related adverse events or clinically relevant abnormalities in hematological, hepatic, or renal safety parameters were observed. Conclusion: Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=205514, identifier (ChiCTR2300075360).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.