ArticleTranslational animal science2026
Nonlinear mixed models to describe the growth of Columbia sheep in Mexico.
Article in Translational animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our objective in this study was to identify the nonlinear mixed model that best describes the growth curve of Columbia sheep within the central region of Mexico. The study was conducted using a total of 1886 live body weight records (birth to 450 days of age) from 174 Columbia Sheep (90 males and 84 females). Only animals with at least four weight records were considered in the study. The sheep were fed twice daily with a ration of corn silage and oat hay. Animals were weaned at an average age of 75 days. Growth curves were fitted using four nonlinear mixed models: Brody, Logistic, Von Bertalanffy, and Gompertz. In all models, the asymptotic body weight (A), integration constant (b), and maturity rate (k) were estimated, with A and k modeled as both fixed and random effects. Sex was included as a fixed effect affecting only the A and k parameters. A model comparison was performed using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), which states that lower AIC indicates better fit. Among the evaluated models, the Von Bertalanffy model provided the best fit for the data. Estimated parameters for females were A = 40.26 kg, b = 0.516, and k = 0.011 day
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.