ArticlePEC innovation2026
Collaborative safety: The impact of patient and caregiver engagement in perioperative care.
Article in PEC innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Patient involvement in perioperative safety is increasingly emphasized, yet opportunities for patients and caregivers to participate meaningfully are often constrained by clinical workflows and limited role clarity. We adapted the One Safe Act (OSA) approach, a resilience-based intervention originally designed for staff, to evaluate whether a simple reflective prompt could foster patient and caregiver engagement. Methods: We conducted an exploratory quality-improvement study in the Perioperative Care Unit between February and August 2024. After routine surgical and anesthesia review, patients and caregivers were invited to identify one action they used or planned to use to promote safety and to complete brief survey items (awareness of safety, perceived role, comfort asking questions, and trust in facility efforts). Free-text responses underwent inductive thematic analysis. Associations between attitudes and behaviors were examined using Fisher's exact test with false-discovery-rate adjustment. Proactive engagement was also assessed at the respondent level. Results: We collected 122 OSA responses (98 patients, 24 caregivers). Most respondents reported awareness of patient safety (71%), endorsed a personal role (90%), felt comfortable asking questions (94%), and trusted the facility's safety efforts (84%). A composite high-engagement profile ("Proactivity Trust") was met by 28%. Eight behavioral themes emerged, most commonly dietary adjustments (33%), strategic planning (32%), and medication adherence (28%); 3% of responses described no specific action. When classified by engagement type, 58% of coded behaviors were routine and 41.8% were proactive. At the respondent level, 40.8% of patients and 45.8% of caregivers reported at least one proactive behavior ( Conclusions: Although most patients recognized a role in safety, fewer reported proactive engagement. The OSA prompt elicited patient- and caregiver-generated safety behaviors and identified opportunities to strengthen engagement. Practice implications: Embedding OSA in preoperative counseling may provide a scalable approach to normalize patient- and caregiver-initiated safety behaviors and strengthen communication at a vulnerable point in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.