ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Prevention of commercial tobacco use among Native American youth.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Culturally grounded approaches to commercial tobacco use (CTU) prevention among Native American youth remain limited. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the Talking Circle Intervention (TCI) and explored preliminary trends in CTU and Native Reliance (cultural identity). Method: A one-group pretest-posttest design was utilized with a community-based participatory research approach. A total of 20 Native American youth ages 10-12 were recruited using nonrandom convenience and snowball sampling approaches from a rural Midwestern tribal community. Primary indicators of feasibility included Results: Primary indicators of feasibility in terms of predefined criterion were met. Benchmark findings included 100% recruitment within the planned timeframe, 100% retention at 3 months, and 100% data completeness across measures. Exploratory analyses indicated a modest decrease in study participant reported CTU scores and an increase in Native Reliance (cultural identity) scores over the study timeframe. Conclusion: Although observed trends in CTU and cultural identity suggest potential promise, these results are preliminary and must be interpreted with caution. Further research using a larger sample size and a randomized controlled design to evaluate the effectiveness of the TCI is warranted and will further clarify how cultural identity functions as a protective factor against CTU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.