ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026
Development of a physical activity promotion intervention for colorectal cancer survivors who are physically inactive: A Delphi study integrating the analytic hierarchy process.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Physical activity (PA) confers multiple health and rehabilitation benefits for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors; however, many CRC survivors do not meet recommended PA levels following curative-intent treatment. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive, evidence-based PA promotion intervention program for CRC survivors who are physically inactive. Methods: A preliminary program was developed based on the COM-B model, a literature review, clinical practice guidelines, and a retrospective case analysis. Between August and October 2025, 15 experts with expertise in clinical nursing, clinical medicine, rehabilitation medicine, and nursing management participated in two rounds of Delphi consultation. Experts completed the questionnaires independently in each round, and aggregated feedback was used to refine the program through an iterative consensus process. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to derive indicator weights and establish a hierarchical framework. Results: Of the 20 experts invited, 15 completed Round 1 (response rate, 75%); all 15 Round 1 participants completed Round 2 (response rate, 100%). The expert authority coefficients were 0.840 and 0.857 in Rounds 1 and 2, respectively. The coefficients of variation for all indicators were below 0.25 in both rounds, and Kendall's coefficients of concordance were 0.188 and 0.228, respectively (both Conclusions: The program developed in this study provides a theoretically grounded, expert-consensus-based framework for promoting PA among CRC survivors who are physically inactive. Its feasibility, acceptability, safety, and preliminary efficacy should be evaluated before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.