Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540373›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The cognitive anchor system: a structural model of self, task selection, and latent intention in human cognition.

Jiangwei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jiangwei LiIndependent Researcher, Guangzhou City, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Human cognition requires both stability and flexibility: individuals maintain a continuous sense of self while shifting among tasks, intentions, and contexts. Existing theories explain information processing, prediction, attention, and control, but they leave under-specified the structural layer that determines what cognition is currently organized around. Methods: This theoretical paper develops the Cognitive Anchor System, a structural framework that distinguishes among the self anchor, the task anchor, and the anchor pool. The model is compared with major theories of attention, intentionality, executive control, predictive processing, working memory, and large-scale neural networks. A minimal boundary function, Results: The framework explains focused attention, task switching, mind wandering, procrastination, decisional conflict, emotional intrusion, creative insight, rumination, and long-term goal maintenance as different configurations of anchor stability, activation, inhibition, and reconfiguration. It generates testable predictions concerning non-linear capacity collapse, collapse-triggered switching, and the continuity of the self anchor under ordinary task competition. Discussion: The Cognitive Anchor System provides an organizational layer linking self-continuity, task selection, and latent intention. It complements existing cognitive theories and offers empirically tractable directions for behavioral, neurocognitive, and computational research.

Indexed as

attention controlcognitive architectureexecutive functionlatent intentionself-representationstructural cognitiontask selectiontask switching

Identifiers

PMID42540373
PMCPMC13425724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.