ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2026
EEG-timed neuromuscular stimulation shapes ipsilateral TMS-evoked motor responses in humans.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Sensorimotor beta activity provides a real-time marker of motor-network state, but whether electroencephalography (EEG)-derived timing of peripheral stimulation can modulate ipsilateral motor output remains unclear. We tested whether EEG-timed neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) alters ipsilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked motor responses in humans. Methods: Twenty right-handed healthy participants completed four sessions of 24 Hz NMES applied to the left extensor digitorum communis. NMES train onset was triggered at four nominal timing conditions derived from the ongoing 24 Hz EEG component over the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex. Ipsilateral motor output was assessed with TMS before and after each intervention. Peak-to-peak amplitudes of ipsilateral TMS-evoked motor responses were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model. Results: EEG-timed NMES produced timing-dependent and muscle-specific changes in ipsilateral TMS-evoked motor response amplitudes. Flexor responses were suppressed across timing conditions, whereas extensor responses increased selectively in one EEG-derived timing condition. This response pattern dissociated generalized antagonist suppression from timing-specific facilitation of the stimulated extensor motor output. Conclusions: Ipsilateral TMS-evoked motor responses are sensitive to the temporal alignment between peripheral input and ongoing EEG-recorded ipsilateral sensorimotor activity. Significance: EEG-timed NMES provides a human neurophysiological framework for probing state-dependent sensorimotor coupling and may inform future closed-loop peripheral neuromodulation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.