Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540329›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

Upcycling of poultry protein hydrolysates using membrane filtration technology - Effects on sensory properties and chemical composition.

Tone Aspevik, Elin Katinka Dankel, Shaun Leivers, Nils Kristian Afseth, Åge Oterhals, John-Erik Haugen, Marianne Skov, Mari Øvrum Gaarder

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tone AspevikNofima, P.O. Box 1425 Oasen, N-5844, Bergen, Norway.
Elin Katinka DankelNofima, P.O. Box 210, N-1431, Ås, Norway.
Shaun LeiversNofima, P.O. Box 210, N-1431, Ås, Norway.
Nils Kristian AfsethNofima, P.O. Box 210, N-1431, Ås, Norway.
Åge OterhalsNofima, P.O. Box 1425 Oasen, N-5844, Bergen, Norway.
John-Erik HaugenNofima, P.O. Box 210, N-1431, Ås, Norway.
Marianne SkovNorilia AS, P.O. Box 396 Økern, N-0513. Oslo, Norway.
Mari Øvrum GaarderNofima, P.O. Box 210, N-1431, Ås, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processing poultry meat generates large amounts of protein-rich side streams. Enzymatic hydrolysis is widely used for upcycling but often produces bitter and unpalatable products. Membrane filtration may improve quality, but its effects on sensory properties and composition remain unclear. This study examined microfiltration (MF), nanofiltration (NF), and diafiltration of a poultry protein hydrolysate using sensory analysis,

Indexed as

Membrane filtrationMicrofiltrationNanofiltrationPoultry protein hydrolysatesSensory propertiesVolatile compounds

Identifiers

PMID42540329
PMCPMC13425802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.