ArticleACS omega2026
Improving the Biocompatibility and Energy Performance of a Microbial Bioanode with Black Phosphorus and Polypyrrole Nanocomposites.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When it comes to enhancing the way bioelectrochemical systems perform, improving how microorganisms and electrodes interact remains challenging. Here, we have modified anodes to improve the performance of microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Specifically, we modified a graphite plate anode (GP) by using three strategieselectroactivation (EGP), electroactivation followed by black phosphorus incorporation (EGP/BP), and subsequent EGP/BP electropolymerization with polypyrrole (EGP/BP/PPy)and evaluated EGP, EGP/BP, and EGP/BP/PPy in dual-chamber MFCs. The MFC anodic biofilm was formed from mangrove sediment in sodium acetate. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed that the modification strategies modified the GP surface and that a robust biofilm emerged after each treatment. The highly modified EGP/BP/PPy performed the best and reached a maximum voltage of 530.0 ± 35 mV, compared to 100.0 ± 18 mV and 10.8 ± 2 mV achieved with EGP/BP and EGP, respectively. EGP/BP/PPy also provided the highest maximum power density and Coulombic charge. Modifying the GP surface influenced the bacterial community composition. The genus
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.