ArticleCureus2026
Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Knee Osteoarthritis Management in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of pain and disability worldwide, with cultural and lifestyle factors shaping its burden in different populations. In Saudi Arabia, the perspectives of both patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) remain underexplored in understanding management approaches. This study aimed to explore patients' and HCPs' perspectives on management strategies for knee osteoarthritis in Saudi Arabia.
methodA qualitative exploratory study was conducted using focus group discussions (FGDs). Participants included patients with knee OA and HCPs involved in knee OA management recruited from three hospitals within Riyadh's First Health Cluster. FGDs were conducted separately for patients and HCPs using a semi-structured interview guide. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim in Arabic, and translated into English using forward-backward translation. Data were analysed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsA total of 58 participants (30 patients and 28 HCPs) were included. Five overarching themes were identified: (i) understanding and risk factors of knee OA, (ii) clinical versus lived experience, (iii) treatment and management priorities, (iv) education and self-management, and (v) barriers and facilitators to adherence. Healthcare professionals demonstrated a biomedical understanding of knee OA, whereas patients showed variable knowledge and uncertainty. Although both groups recognised obesity and physical inactivity as key risk factors, a gap existed between knowledge and behaviour. Patients reported broader impacts on daily life and psychological well-being, which HCPs emphasised less. Divergence in treatment priorities was observed, with HCPs emphasising exercise while patients relied more on pharmacological management. Barriers to adherence included limited understanding, low motivation, and constraints in the healthcare system, while facilitators included social support and perceived improvement.
conclusionsKnee OA management in Saudi Arabia is influenced by misalignment between clinical approaches and patient experiences, as well as cultural and system-level factors. Addressing these gaps through patient-centred, culturally tailored interventions and improved support for self-management may enhance adherence and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.