Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540177›Full record

ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2026

Efficacy and safety of venanprubart, a BTLA agonist antibody, in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus.

Indrajit Ghosh, Susan E Sweeney, Brian Moser, Andrea Ferrante, Jennifer W Witcher, Javier Munoz-Briones, Ching-Yun Chang, Matthew D Linnik, Andrew C Vendel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Indrajit GhoshEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Susan E SweeneyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Brian MoserEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Andrea FerranteEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jennifer W WitcherEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Javier Munoz-BrionesEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ching-Yun ChangEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Matthew D LinnikEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Andrew C VendelEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This phase 2 study's objective was to determine whether venanprubart is superior to placebo for inducing remission of rash and/or arthritis in patients with at least moderately active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Patients (N = 85) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to venanprubart (N = 42) or placebo (N = 43) in a multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 2-arm, phase 2 clinical trial. Treatment (450 mg venanprubart or placebo) was administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks along with standard of care for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was remission of rash and/or arthritis as defined by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) 2000 at week (W) 24. Patients who discontinued the study or violated concomitant medication rules were imputed to nonresponse. Results: The study was terminated early based on lack of efficacy at the interim analysis. Venanprubart did not separate from placebo in inducing remission of rash and/or arthritis in 54 patients (26 on venanprubart; 28 on placebo) with SLE at W24. Patients treated with venanprubart were not significantly different from placebo for SLEDAI-4 response or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 response through W24. The number of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar across treatment groups. Patients treated with venanprubart reported 4 (9.5%) serious adverse events, whereas patients treated with placebo reported 1 (2.3%). No deaths occurred during the study. B and T lymphocyte attenuator receptor occupancy approached saturation on B cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells at all postrandomisation time points. Conclusions: Venanprubart did not demonstrate superiority to placebo in achieving remission of rash and/or arthritis. Venanprubart was safe and well tolerated.

Identifiers

PMID42540177
PMCPMC13425223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.