ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2026
Disparities in the access to and use of biologic and targeted synthetic treatments in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a scoping review.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To identify disparities in the access to and use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs). Methods: A systematic search of literature was conducted in Embase, Medline (to 30 May 2023), and relevant congress databases (to June 2023). Interventional and observational studies reporting measures of disparity in access to, receipt of, or utilisation of b/tsDMARDs in iRMDs were eligible. Outcomes included access to b/tsDMARDs, likelihood to receive treatment, time to first initiation, treatment adherence, and treatment persistence. Disparities across these outcomes are reported. Reporting follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews guidance. Results: Of 4218 publications identified, 104 were included in this scoping review. All studies were observational; 70% reported data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and 65% were from North America or Europe. Gender (58%) and age (54%) were commonly investigated factors. Lower gross domestic product/capita ( Conclusions: Disparities in access to and use of b/tsDMARDs are reported in the literature along with the role of commonly studied social determinants of health (SDoH). More research is needed to identify the full spectrum of existing disparities and to reveal the role of SDoH, including the lesser-studied ones.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.