ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and validation of a novel prognostic score for HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute-on-chronic liver failure patients have high short-term mortality rates, and HBV infection is the most common cause. Current prognostic models for HBV-ACLF patients have limitations. Thus, the development of an ideal model remains an important unsolved problem. Aims: To develop a new model and validate its prognostic predictive capacity. Methods: Among 5854 liver failure patients admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from 2008 to 2023, 1170 HBV-ACLF cases were finally enrolled, which were randomly divided into a development cohort ( Results: The AHF-MELD and AHN-MELD scores' predictive capacity were stronger than MELD, MELD-sodium, CLIF-C OF and AARC scores and comparable to CLIF-C ACLF, COSSH ACLF and COSSH ACLF II scores. There was no significant difference between the observed and the predicted 28-day and 90-day mortality probabilities of new scores. The AHF-MELD and AHN-MELD scores have positive net benefits over a wide range of threshold probabilities and outperform conventional scores. The 28-day and 90-day survival rates were significantly lower in high-risk groups than in low-risk groups. Conclusion: The AHF-MELD and AHN-MELD scores may serve as potential predictive tools for the short-term prognosis of HBV-ACLF patients. Our study may provide useful information for clinicians managing these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.