Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540006›Full record

ArticleActa radiologica open2026

Mapping outcomes in randomised radiology trials: Protocol for a scoping review.

Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Christoph Felix Müller, Martin Lundsgaard Hansen, Mia Kolmos, Simona Gentile, Lea Marie Pehrson, Cecilie Juul Mørck Offersen, Silvia Ingala, Lars Birger Lönn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta radiologica open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benjamin Skov Kaas-HansenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1023-0371
Christoph Felix MüllerDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin Lundsgaard HansenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mia KolmosDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-1399
Simona GentileDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3212-2865
Lea Marie PehrsonDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cecilie Juul Mørck OffersenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Silvia IngalaDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Birger LönnDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This scoping review aims to systematically map how outcomes are defined and operationalised in contemporary radiological randomised clinical trials (RCTs). The findings will inform a subsequent Delphi process to develop a core outcome set for clinical studies in radiology, including adaptive platform trials (APTs), conventional RCTs, and observational studies. Methods including end points: The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with PRISMA-P and PRISMA-ScR guidelines and will encompass articles published from 1 January 2023 in select high-impact general medical and radiological journals, using a search strategy developed and vetted by an independent information specialist. The search strategy yielded 4,202 hits on 7 April 2026. All steps, from screening through data extraction, will be done in duplicate by two independent authors. Extracted trial data will include number of trial sites, number of participants, sub-speciality, intervention type, and interventions under study. For each outcome in each trial, we will extract the name and type of the outcome, operationalisation/definition/tool used, assessment of temporality (e.g. truncation, censoring, repeated sampling), missingness proportion, missingness handling, effect quantification, and statistical analyses of effects (e.g. unadjusted or regression-model based). Data extraction will start with a 10-trial pilot phase for maximised data quality. Data synthesis will be descriptive without risk of bias evaluation. Implications: This scoping review will map how outcomes are defined and operationalised in contemporary radiological RCTs and inform a Delphi process to identify core outcomes for APTs and RCTs, supporting the advancement of value-based radiology.

Indexed as

epidemiologyexperimental investigationsoutcome analysisstatisticstechnology assessmenttreatment effects

Identifiers

PMID42540006
PMCPMC13424935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.