Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539978›Full record

ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2026

Risk-benefit considerations for antirheumatic drug use in pregnancy, breastfeeding, and male preconception: expert perspectives.

Andrea Pluma, Linda Rüegg, Sabrina Hamroun, Irene Cecchi, Axel Finckh, Yvette Meissner, Frauke Förger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea PlumaDepartment of Rheumatology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Linda RüeggMedical Center Monbijou, Rheumatology, Bern, Switzerland.
Sabrina HamrounDepartment of Rheumatology, Nord-Ouest Val d'Oise Hospital, Pontoise, France.
Irene CecchiUniversity Center of Excellence on Nephrologic, Rheumatologic and Rare Diseases (ERKNet, ERN Reconnect and RITA ERN Member) with Nephrology and Dialysis Unit and Center of Immuno Rheumatology and Rare Diseases (CMID), Coordinating Center of the Interregional Network for Rare Diseases of Piedmont and Aosta Valley, San Giovanni Bosco Hub Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Axel FinckhGeneva University Hospital, Rheumatology Division, Geneva, Switzerland.
Yvette MeissnerGerman Rheumatology Research Center Berlin, Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Berlin, Germany.
Frauke FörgerDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Managing antirheumatic drug therapy during family planning, pregnancy, and breastfeeding remains challenging in rheumatology. Since inactive rheumatic disease is an important prerequisite for favourable fertility and pregnancy outcomes, clinicians must weigh the risk of drug exposure against the risk of uncontrolled disease. This study explored how considerations of disease activity influence prescribing decisions. Methods: We surveyed 20 experts from the EULAR (European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) task force on their use of antirheumatic drugs in reproduction, pregnancy, and lactation. Results: In pregnant women, antimalarials, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, calcineurin inhibitors, colchicine, and the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor certolizumab would mostly be prescribed as if the patient were not pregnant. Decisions to use other biologics during gestation were based on knowledge of relative drug safety and the risk of active disease without treatment. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and glucocorticoids during pregnancy were largely restricted to the control of active disease. In breastfeeding women, experts would use most antirheumatic drugs as if the patient were not breastfeeding, including many biologics. In male patients planning a family, experts would use many drugs as if the patient did not plan to father a child, including colchicine, methotrexate, leflunomide, sildenafil, and biologics, while Janus kinase inhibitors and other drugs with limited data would be avoided or used only to treat severe disease. Conclusions: These findings highlight a progressive shift towards individualised, disease activity-guided prescribing, alongside growing confidence in the relative safety of several antirheumatic drugs. Expert surveys help define consensus, identify uncertainties, and guide future practice.

Identifiers

PMID42539978
PMCPMC13424995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.