ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2026
Risk-benefit considerations for antirheumatic drug use in pregnancy, breastfeeding, and male preconception: expert perspectives.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Managing antirheumatic drug therapy during family planning, pregnancy, and breastfeeding remains challenging in rheumatology. Since inactive rheumatic disease is an important prerequisite for favourable fertility and pregnancy outcomes, clinicians must weigh the risk of drug exposure against the risk of uncontrolled disease. This study explored how considerations of disease activity influence prescribing decisions. Methods: We surveyed 20 experts from the EULAR (European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) task force on their use of antirheumatic drugs in reproduction, pregnancy, and lactation. Results: In pregnant women, antimalarials, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, calcineurin inhibitors, colchicine, and the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor certolizumab would mostly be prescribed as if the patient were not pregnant. Decisions to use other biologics during gestation were based on knowledge of relative drug safety and the risk of active disease without treatment. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and glucocorticoids during pregnancy were largely restricted to the control of active disease. In breastfeeding women, experts would use most antirheumatic drugs as if the patient were not breastfeeding, including many biologics. In male patients planning a family, experts would use many drugs as if the patient did not plan to father a child, including colchicine, methotrexate, leflunomide, sildenafil, and biologics, while Janus kinase inhibitors and other drugs with limited data would be avoided or used only to treat severe disease. Conclusions: These findings highlight a progressive shift towards individualised, disease activity-guided prescribing, alongside growing confidence in the relative safety of several antirheumatic drugs. Expert surveys help define consensus, identify uncertainties, and guide future practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.