ReviewJRSM cardiovascular disease
State of the art: Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention.
Review in JRSM cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has a community prevalence of 3%, which increases with age and affects up to 7% of elderly patients. TR is secondary (functional) in 90% of cases (usually resulting from left heart disease and/or pulmonary hypertension), although atrial dilatation is an increasingly recognised cause. Awareness of the poor prognosis associated with increasing TR severity has refocused the quest for effective treatments. Surgical intervention has been hindered by high in-hospital mortality (up to 10%), even in carefully selected cases, and transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVIs) have emerged as a low-risk alternative for this high-risk cohort. Increasing data demonstrate the clinical safety and efficacy of TTVIs, but uncertainties remain concerning optimal case selection and procedural timing. Herein, we review newly established techniques alongside emerging clinical and procedural outcome data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.