Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539948›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2026

Sun-protective behaviours in US adults with a history of skin cancer: a cross-sectional National Health Interview Survey study.

Hannah Verma, Benjamin Hu, Nithya Krishnamurthy, Annie Chang, Raphaella Lambert, Grace Rabinowitz, Nicholas Gulati, Jonas Adalsteinsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannah VermaKimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0402-7828
Benjamin HuKimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Nithya KrishnamurthyKimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9091-1927
Annie ChangKimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4692-6338
Raphaella LambertKimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5175-959X
Grace RabinowitzKimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Nicholas GulatiKimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jonas AdalsteinssonDepartment of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Individuals with a history of skin cancer are at elevated risk for subsequent malignancies, underscoring the importance of sustained photoprotective behaviours. However, little is known about how these behaviours evolve over time following diagnosis. Objectives: To assess the prevalence of sun-protective behaviours among adults with and without a history of skin cancer and to evaluate whether adherence varies based on time since diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using pooled data from the 2005-15 National Health Interview Survey. Weighted estimates were used to compare photoprotective behaviours, including sun avoidance, use of protective clothing, sunscreen application, use of tanning devices and sunburn history, between respondents with and without a history of skin cancer, stratified by years since diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess adjusted odds ratios (aORs). Results: Individuals with a history of skin cancer reported significantly higher use of sunscreen and protective clothing, and lower use of tanning devices than controls. Behaviours varied over time, and those with 1-4 years or ≥10 years since diagnosis had a significantly higher odds of using protective clothing compared with controls (adjusted OR 3.17, 95% confidence interval 1.35-7.46 for 1-4 years; adjusted OR 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.22-4.79 for ≥10 years). Conclusions: Photoprotective behaviours varied by time since diagnosis, with peak adherence seen 1-4 years postdiagnosis. Photoprotection improves after skin cancer diagnosis but may change over time, supporting the need for ongoing patient education.

Identifiers

PMID42539948
PMCPMC13425089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.