ArticlePublic health weekly report2026
Infectious Disease Preparedness and Response for Mass Gatherings at Milano Cortina 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games.
Article in Public health weekly report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The Milano Cortina 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games were large-scale international mass gathering events associated with an elevated risk of infectious disease transmission and potential cross-border spread. This report describes the infectious disease preparedness and response system established by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) to protect the Korean delegation and to generate evidence to inform policy development for future international mass gathering events. Methods: A structured preparedness and response framework was implemented before the event. This included the establishment of an interagency coordination mechanism and the development of a infectious disease preparedness and response plan. An infectious disease task force was constituted to conduct situation assessment meetings, epidemiological surveillance, risk assessment, and incident management. During the event, suspected and confirmed infectious disease cases were actively monitored, and all response activities were systematically documented for post-event evaluation. Results: The KDCA established a coordinated multi-sectoral response network involving relevant national ministries and supporting organizations, including the Korean Sport & Olympic Committee and the Korea Paralympic Committee. An infectious disease task force comprising a central headquarters unit and five functional teams was deployed for epidemiological surveillance, risk assessment, risk communication, situation management, and post-event evaluation. Continuous real-time monitoring and structured situation reporting enabled timely detection and response to potential public health threats during the event period. Two formal situation assessment meetings were conducted to ensure interagency coordination and operational alignment. Following the event, a structured post-event evaluation was conducted to assess response effectiveness, operational performance, and resource utilization. Conclusions: The KDCA response framework demonstrated operational feasibility for infectious disease risks during international mass gatherings. This system may serve as a foundational model for the development of a standardized national preparedness and response framework for future international events. It also provides policy-relevant evidence to support the institutionalization of coordinated public health emergency systems for future similar events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.