Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539940›Full record

ArticleSports medicine and health science2026

Sagittal plane joint mechanics during downhill running in female distance runners.

Meredith D Wells, D Clark Dickin, Jennifer Popp, He Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine and health science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meredith D WellsSuperfeet Worldwide LLC, Ferndale, WA, USA.
D Clark DickinSchool of Kinesiology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA.
Jennifer PoppDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
He WangSchool of Kinesiology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hill training is often used as a foundational training method to increase strength and speed. However, there is limited research regarding the mechanics involved in downhill running, particularly for declines greater than -10%, despite trail and hill training commonly occurring in long distance running. Thus, the purpose of this study was to quantify the biomechanics of downhill running at four different declines compared to a level surface in female distance runners and to assess the potential risk of injury relative to level running. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, fifteen female distance runners (age: [23.5 ​± ​4.9] years; mileage: [56.3 ​± ​20.9] km/week) ran on a force-instrumented treadmill at 4.0 m⋅s Results: Key study findings showed increased power absorption at the ankle and knee ( Conclusion: Results indicate that there may be a greater risk for injury when running downhill compared to running on a level surface based on risk factors for common running injuries illustrated in prior research.

Indexed as

BiomechanicsFemalesInjury riskMotion captureRunning

Identifiers

PMID42539940
PMCPMC13424963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.