Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539936›Full record

ArticleSports medicine and health science2026

A cross-sectional study of 2

Amanda Alfaro-Chaverri, Arthur Miller, Curtis Noonan, John Quindry, Steven E Gaskill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine and health science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda Alfaro-ChaverriIntegrative Physiology and Athletic Training, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Arthur MillerIntegrative Physiology and Athletic Training, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Curtis NoonanPublic and Community Health, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
John QuindryIntegrative Physiology and Athletic Training, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Steven E GaskillIntegrative Physiology and Athletic Training, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Decreased physical activity (PA) influences childhood obesity and student learning. Sixty minutes (min) of daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) are recommended for good health and optimized academic achievement. Methods: We quantified all-day and in-school PA in association with academic success. Cross-sectional accelerometer data from 1 115 second-twelfth graders were evaluated for daily and in-school MVPA and vigorous physical activity (VPA). Associations between PA values and year-end grade point average (GPA) in grades 6-12 and criterion referenced standardized tests in reading (CRT-R) and math (CRT-M) were examined for grades 3-8 and 11 by multivariable regression. Results: MVPA and VPA declined as student grade level increased. Higher in-school and full-day PA was associated with increased academic success (e.g., GPA and standardized testing), with the effect size increasing with advancing grade level. Accumulating 30 ​min more of in-school MVPA was associated with 0.63 higher GPA. Accumulating 10 ​min more of in-school VPA was associated with higher standardized test scores: +11.9% and +12.0% for CRT-M and CRT-R, respectively. Conclusions: Across advancing grade levels, students were on average less physically active. Habitual physical activity at every grade level was associated with higher levels of academic success based on GPA and standardized test scores in both math and reading.

Indexed as

CognitionEducationModerate exerciseVigorous exercise

Identifiers

PMID42539936
PMCPMC13424724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.