Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539922›Full record

ReviewSkin health and disease2026

Efficacy and safety of topical statins for porokeratosis: a systematic review and practice-guided synthesis.

Mohammed Shanshal, Aarthy Uthayakumar, Emily Moon, Laksha Bala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skin health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed ShanshalDepartment of Dermatology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Aarthy UthayakumarDepartment of Dermatology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Emily MoonDepartment of Dermatology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6839-2723
Laksha BalaDepartment of Dermatology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-379X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Porokeratosis comprises keratinization disorders with few consistently effective, nondestructive treatments. Topical inhibition of the mevalonate pathway with statins is biologically plausible, but the clinical evidence is scattered across small reports. Objectives: To consolidate fragmented data into a pragmatic framework for clinicians and to highlight priorities for future controlled trails. Methods: We performed a PRISMA-based systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov to 8 December 2025, including all study designs that reported patient-level outcomes with topical statins. Results: Thirty-three studies involving 162 patients met the inclusion criteria: three small, randomized trials and predominantly case series and case reports. In nonrandomized studies with analysable data ( Conclusions: Overall, topical statin monotherapy emerges as a mechanism-based, field-directed option for porokeratosis, particularly DSAP, most often yielding partial rather than complete clearance with a favourable safety signal.

Identifiers

PMID42539922
PMCPMC13424892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.