ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2026
Single-center Experience with Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Using Circulating Tumor DNA for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has recently become available in Japan, but its clinical utility in daily practice remains unclear. We retrospectively evaluated 19 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who underwent plasma-based CGP (Guardant360 CDx) between November 2023 and May 2025. ctDNA was detected in 18 of 19 patients (95%) with previously treated mCRC. The median turnaround time from blood collection to result was 11 days (range: 7-15). The median number of gene alterations was 5 (range: 1-29), and pathogenic/likely pathogenic alterations were identified in 15 patients (79%). ctDNA was preferentially selected over tissue CGP in patients with small tumor burden, lack of contemporary tumor sample, or double cancer (considering spatial and temporal heterogeneity). Three patients initially identified with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.