ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2026
Targeting tumor transition windows.
Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor heterogeneity and cellular plasticity are major drivers of therapeutic failure across many cancer types. While precision oncology has largely focused on static genomic alterations, growing evidence indicates that tumors behave as dynamic biological systems that continuously adapt during treatment. Tumor cell populations can transition between distinct functional states under therapeutic pressure, including transient drug-tolerant phenotypes that may precede stabilization of genetically or epigenetically resistant clones. These transitions are shaped by mechanisms such as epigenetic reprogramming, stress-response signaling, metabolic rewiring, and microenvironmental interactions. This review synthesizes findings from tumor plasticity, drug-tolerant persister biology, therapy-induced vulnerabilities, clonal evolution, and adaptive therapy to examine how temporal tumor dynamics influence treatment response. Emerging evidence suggests that some tumors may pass through short-lived phases of cellular instability during therapy in which molecular dependencies, stress-response programs, or adaptive survival states are altered before resistance becomes genetically or epigenetically stabilized. However, such transition states should be considered therapeutically actionable only when linked to functional evidence of altered drug sensitivity, pathway dependence, immune susceptibility, or clinical response. Advances in single-cell transcriptomics, epigenomic profiling, serial circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA)/cfDNA analysis, multi-omics integration, and dynamic imaging are enabling longitudinal monitoring of tumor state transitions and may facilitate identification of transient biological states preceding stable resistance. Integrating temporal tumor biology with therapeutic sequencing strategies, adaptive treatment schedules, and biomarker-guided monitoring may therefore help test whether specific adaptive states can be therapeutically exploited and may refine precision oncology approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.