ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Building bridges to care: A co-created community palliative care package for resource-limited settings.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Palliative care (PC) needs are substantial in Nigeria, yet access to specialist PC services remains limited, particularly in rural and peri-urban communities. Objectives: To co-create an implementation-ready, community-delivered PC package for rural Nigerian settings without PC specialists and specify its components, delivery roles, and referral pathways. Design: Sequential explanatory mixed-methods, participatory co-creation design in which quantitative prioritization informed qualitative refinement. Methods: Participants (health professionals, traditional and religious leaders, patients, caregivers, advocates, and policymakers) used Results: Participants prioritized effective pain and symptom relief, strengthened communication and shared decision-making, intentional engagement of religious leaders, and improved community-primary care collaboration. The resulting package comprises three components (pain and symptom management, psychosocial support, spiritual care) delivered via a hub-and-spoke model in which CHEWs/CHAs serve as community "Anchors," while facility-based basic PC providers and tertiary specialists provide oversight and manage complex cases. Key barriers included limited training and stigma, medication access constraints, and weak referral systems; proposed solutions emphasized training with supportive supervision, improved medicines access/financing and strengthened referral pathways and community support structures. Conclusion: A participant-designed, task-shared, hub-linked community PC package is feasible in principle for Nigerian settings without PC specialists and provides an implementation-ready blueprint for feasibility testing, adaptation, and scale-up planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.