Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539856›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine international2026

Comparison of Bolus and Continuous Hydration Regimens for the Prevention of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial.

Yunus Emre Gemici, Furkan Ay, Alper Görkem Cimen, İbrahim Sarbay, Mustafa Calik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yunus Emre GemiciDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye, medeniyet.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1557-6325
Furkan AyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7575-5591
Alper Görkem CimenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2395-2845
İbrahim SarbayDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8804-2501
Mustafa CalikDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3184-2943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The optimal rate and duration of isotonic hydration therapy for preventing contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) remain poorly established. As prolonged hydration therapy is impractical due to the urgency of diagnostic imaging and the limited time available for monitoring in the emergency departments (EDs), this study evaluated whether bolus hydration regimens are noninferior to prolonged hydration protocols. Methods: This single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial was conducted at the ED of a training and research hospital between August 10, 2024, and April 26, 2025. 257 patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) with baseline creatinine levels above the reference range (1.2 mg/dL in men and 1.1 mg/dL in women) were included. Patients were stratified by age and sex and randomized to bolus or continuous hydration. The bolus group received 500 mL of isotonic fluid within 30 min before the procedure, followed by 500 mL/hour for 2 h postprocedure. The continuous group received 150 mL/hour for 2 h before and 8 h after the procedure. The primary outcome was the development of CA-AKI, defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ≥ 25% or ≥ 0.5 mg/dL at 48-72 h following contrast administration. Secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality and the need for dialysis. Results: The two groups were well-matched in terms of demographic, clinical, or biochemical parameters. The mean baseline creatinine was 1.4 ± 0.21 mg/dL, and the eGFR was 45.6 ± 9.8 mL/min/1.73 m Conclusion: In this single-center noninferiority trial, a bolus hydration regimen was noninferior to a prolonged continuous regimen for preventing CA-AKI in ED patients with moderately impaired baseline renal function. Bolus hydration may offer a practical alternative in time-constrained ED settings; however, multicenter confirmation is warranted before routine adoption.

Indexed as

acute kidney injurycontrast mediaemergency medicinehydration therapytomography

Identifiers

PMID42539856
PMCPMC13424603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.